PH Firms | Knowledge Centre | Intranet | Training Portal Firms  |  Home    
 
      Hot off the Press
  Home
  Useful Links
 
  Contact Us
  Library Search
  Admin
 
 
 

call for a revised version of new judiciary laws
14 May 2007


 
CHIEF Justice Pius Langa has entered the fray on the shelved legislation intended to transform the judiciary, urging the removal of controversial clauses which negatively impact on the independence of the judiciary.
Objections from the legal community has seen the Superior Courts Bill and its parallel amendment to the constitution shelved.

Justice Minister Brigitte Mabandla has indicated that it will be another year before the bills are re-tabled in Parliament.

Issues in the bills concerning administrative control of the courts, the making of rules of court and other issues have been slammed for invading the constitutional independence of the judiciary.

Addressing Parliament’s justice committee, along with the president of the Supreme Court of Appeal, Craig Howie, and Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke, Langa urged that there should be no delay in enacting provisions that improved access to justice for ordinary South Africans. He said the controversial bits of the legislation should stand over but the rest should go ahead.

Part of what Langa was talking about was the creation of a seat of the high court in each of the provinces. Some of the provinces are still without divisions of the high court and many of the existing divisions still have the names they enjoyed before 1994.

“Enact those areas where there is agreement,” Langa said adding that it was “painful” that people still had to travel across provincial boundaries to access courts.

He also made reference to the amendments to the Judicial Service Commission Act that would provide measure to regulate the conduct of judges and set up a complaints procedure.

Deputy Justice Minister Johnny de Lange upped the ante on the debate this week when he argued that if the issue of payment for work done after retirement was raised, the judges should also debate the current payment of a full salary to judges for the rest of their lives.

Wyndham Hartley, www.law24.co.za

 

 
 
  © phatshoane henney inc. 2007

Contact Us  |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy