PH Firms | Knowledge Centre | Intranet | Training Portal Firms  |  Home    
 
      Hot off the Press
  Home
  Useful Links
 
  Contact Us
  Library Search
  Admin
 
 
 

Health department to oppose doctors 
9 January 2009

The health department would oppose the bid by dispensing doctors to have the courts scrap the laws controlling the fees they may charge for medicines they provide to their patients, according to health department spokesman, Fidel Hadebe. The National Convention on Dispensing (NCD), which represents dispensing doctors, is hoping to get the provisions in the Medicines Act that control their fees declared unlawful. These say doctors may levy fees of up to 16% for medicines that cost less than R100, and may not charge more than R16 on medicines above this threshold.

NCD chairman Norman Mabasa said the fees, which were set in April 2004, were so low that it was uneconomical for doctors to dispense expensive medicines and many had stopped doing so altogether, compromising the quality of care for poor patients. Dispensing doctors are largely clustered in townships and rural communities that do not have ready access to retail pharmacies.  “The dispensing fee does not provide medical practitioners with sufficient revenue to cover the operating costs associated with maintaining an adequate stock of medicines and dispensing them to patients,” he said in court papers.

Mabasa told Business Day that 8000 doctors had been issued with dispensing licences before the pricing regulations came into effect, but only about 6000 were actually dispensing. Research commissioned by the NCD found doctors needed to be able to levy a dispensing fee of 30%-40%, he said.  “We suspect that having failed to stop doctors from dispensing medicines, (the health department) intends the low dispensing fees to do the same, by making us do it at a loss,” he said, referring to a ruling by the Constitutional Court in 2005 that rejected the department’s attempt to prevent doctors from dispensing medicines within 5km of a pharmacy.

The NCD served papers on Health Minister Barbara Hogan and the chairperson of the pricing committee charged with overseeing the medicine pricing regulations on December 18, giving them 15 days to indicate whether they planned to oppose the legal challenge. Hadebe said the minister had sought legal advice, and would oppose the matter. He declined to be drawn on whether the department was open to settling out of court. Mabasa said the NCD had taken legal action because its numerous attempts to get the health department to consider revising the dispensing fee had failed. But the group remained hopeful that the matter could be settled out of court, he said.

The NCD had hoped that the department would review doctors’ fees when it was forced by the Constitutional Court to revise fees for pharmacists, he said. The Constitutional Court ruled in September 2005 that while the health department had the right to regulate the fees charged by pharmacists, the quantum it had set was inappropriate. It ordered the department to revise pharmacists’ dispensing fees, which had been capped at R26 for prescription medicines. Pharmacists rejected the department’s revised fee structure, and launched a fresh legal challenge. The matter is due to be heard next month.

Tamar Kahn, www. businessday.co.za


 

  Werksmans - The Consumer Protection Act, 2008: liability of the manufacturer for defective products
  Werksmans - Consequences of non - compliance with the CPA
  Werksmans - The impact of the Consumer Protection Act on leases: landlords must get their houses in order
  Werksmans - The Consumer Protection Act - a brief overview of the draft General Regulations
  Werksmans - Looking into the crystal ball: product labelling and pre-sales warnings in terms of the new Consumer Protection Act, 2008
  Werksmans - The Consumer Protection Act No. 68 of 2008 : cracking codes
  Werksmans - The Consumer Protection Act: an opportunity for class action suits in South Africa?
  Werksmans - Re-evaluating franchise agreements and disclosure practices under the Consumer Protection Act
  Werksmans - Warranties in terms of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008
  Werksmans - Liability of the Manufacturer & CPA
  Werksmans - Consumer Protection Act No. 68 of 2008: Don´t be left in the dark
  Werksmans - Fair and just terms: lets leave it to the courts
  Werksmans - Compliant goods - been there done that
  Webber Wentzel - Introduction of new laws to protect consumers imminent
  Webber Wentzel - The impact of the Consumer Protection Act on contracts
  Deneys Reitz - Consumer Commission gears up for 1 April
  Deneys Reitz - Protect consumers, protect yourself and do it now
  Deneys Reitz - Freedom of Contract and the Consumer Protection Act
  Deneys Reitz - In a Different Class: Litigation & Product Liability
  Deneys Reitz - Consumer Act regulations will cause problems
  Deneys Reitz - The impact of the Consumer Protection Act on Insurance
  Deneys Reitz - The Consumer Protection Act and cross-border transactions
  Deneys Reitz - The effect the Consumer Protection Act will have on the sale of property
  Deneys Reitz - The Financial Services Board and the consumer
  Deneys Reitz - An Introduction to The Consumer Protection Act
  Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - Gift voucher and pre-paid certificate conditions to be regulated under the CPA
  Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - Franchise agreements and the Consumer Protection Act
  Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - Consumer Protection Act - Five days to cool off at the pool of your new home
  Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - Fixed-term agreements under the Consumer Protection Act – interesting implications for landlords
  Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - The Consumer Protection Act – A New Liability
  Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - Competition regulations change under the Consumer Protection Act.
  Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - The Consumer Protection Act
  Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - No quick fix! The consumer’s right to claim a refund under the Consumer Protection Act
  Bowman Gilfillan - Much more to a name than meets the Consumer Protection Act´s eye
  Bowman Gilfillan - The Consumer Protection Act: The Duty To Register Names
  Bowman Gilfillan - Consumer Protection Act and leases
  Bowman Gilfillan - An opportunity for franchisors — The Consumer Protection Act
  Bowman Gilfillan - Key franchising aspects of the consumer protection act
  Impact of CPA (2)
  Impact of CPA (1)
  Adams & Adams - Are you ready for the Consumer Protection Act
  Adams & Adams - Minister’s attempt to delay application of CPA might be invalid
  An Introduction to and the General Application of the Consumer Protection Act
  Residential Lease Agreements and The Consumer Protection Act
  Voetstoots Clauses And The Consumer Protection Act
  I Know My Rights.Do You Know Yours?
  Fundamental Consumer Protection Rights under the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008
  Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008
  CPA imposes strict liability on suppliers
  Indirect implications of the CPA must be considered
  The exposure of suppliers for product liability claims

 
 
  © phatshoane henney inc. 2007

Contact Us  |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy