PH Firms | Knowledge Centre | Intranet | Training Portal Firms  |  Home    
 
      Hot off the Press
  Home
  Useful Links
 
  Contact Us
  Library Search
  Admin
 
 
 

Special levies
21 May 2009

During an economic downturn that has many of us tightening our belts the last thing we welcome is an unexpected expense. As an owner in a sectional title scheme however, unexpected expenses are a real possibility. We all know that we have to pay our general levy, which is the result of an owner-approved budget at each annual general meeting and is normally payable in monthly instalments, but we are also liable to pay any special levies that are validly raised by the trustees from time to time. General levies are part of our budgets, but special levies generally hit us out of the blue. We explain the law applicable to these special levies so that you can be armed next time one is raised by the trustees in your scheme.

The Sectional Titles Act 95 of 1986 ("the Act") itself does not mention special levies. The management rules prescribed under the Regulations to the Act deal with special levies in prescribed management rule ("PMR") 31(4). PMR 31(4) gives the trustees the power to raise special levies from time to time provided that two requirements are met. Firstly the expense for which the special levy is raised must be necessary and secondly the expense must not have been budgeted for in the budget approved by the owners at the last annual general meeting. The trustees may decide in resolving to raise a special levy that such levy will be payable in one lump sum or in such instalments and at such times as the trustees think fit.

It seems from the wording of PMR 31(4) that the trustees have been empowered with the ability to raise special levies for unforeseen and unexpected expenses.

The requirement of necessity is difficult to definitively interpret as it is a subjective concept which may differ from person to person or from board of trustees to board of trustees. Additionally, the requirement that the expense item must not have been budgeted for creates the problem that technically the trustees are not able to raise special levies to cover the shortfall when a budgeted item has been under-budgeted for.

Save for the requirements set out above, PMR 31(4) does not give us an indication as to what expense items justify the imposition of a special levy. Disputes often arise when special levies are purportedly raised for an expense item that appears to be an improvement to the common property. Luxurious and non-luxurious improvements to the common property are governed by PMR 33 and require particular processes to be followed and levels of owner consensus to be obtained before they are authorised. Trustees do not have the power to simply raise special levies for improvements to the common property as envisaged by PMR 33 without following the requisite procedures.

It must be noted that in terms of section 37(2) of the Act, the persons who are owners at the time the special levy was raised are liable to pay the special levy. This becomes especially important when a special levy is raised and becomes due and payable after an owner has sold his unit but before the transfer of ownership has taken place. As soon as the unit has been transferred from the seller to the purchaser the seller may believe that he is not liable to pay the special levy anymore because he is no longer the owner of the unit. But because the seller was the owner at the time the special levy was raised and became due and payable - the body corporate is only entitled to recover the special levy from him and has no legal entitlement to recover the special levy from the purchaser as the new owner in the absence of some other contractual arrangement.

Jennifer Paddock, www.ghostdigest.co.za

 

  Werksmans - The Consumer Protection Act, 2008: liability of the manufacturer for defective products
  Werksmans - Consequences of non - compliance with the CPA
  Werksmans - The impact of the Consumer Protection Act on leases: landlords must get their houses in order
  Werksmans - The Consumer Protection Act - a brief overview of the draft General Regulations
  Werksmans - Looking into the crystal ball: product labelling and pre-sales warnings in terms of the new Consumer Protection Act, 2008
  Werksmans - The Consumer Protection Act No. 68 of 2008 : cracking codes
  Werksmans - The Consumer Protection Act: an opportunity for class action suits in South Africa?
  Werksmans - Re-evaluating franchise agreements and disclosure practices under the Consumer Protection Act
  Werksmans - Warranties in terms of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008
  Werksmans - Liability of the Manufacturer & CPA
  Werksmans - Consumer Protection Act No. 68 of 2008: Don´t be left in the dark
  Werksmans - Fair and just terms: lets leave it to the courts
  Werksmans - Compliant goods - been there done that
  Webber Wentzel - Introduction of new laws to protect consumers imminent
  Webber Wentzel - The impact of the Consumer Protection Act on contracts
  Deneys Reitz - Consumer Commission gears up for 1 April
  Deneys Reitz - Protect consumers, protect yourself and do it now
  Deneys Reitz - Freedom of Contract and the Consumer Protection Act
  Deneys Reitz - In a Different Class: Litigation & Product Liability
  Deneys Reitz - Consumer Act regulations will cause problems
  Deneys Reitz - The impact of the Consumer Protection Act on Insurance
  Deneys Reitz - The Consumer Protection Act and cross-border transactions
  Deneys Reitz - The effect the Consumer Protection Act will have on the sale of property
  Deneys Reitz - The Financial Services Board and the consumer
  Deneys Reitz - An Introduction to The Consumer Protection Act
  Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - Gift voucher and pre-paid certificate conditions to be regulated under the CPA
  Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - Franchise agreements and the Consumer Protection Act
  Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - Consumer Protection Act - Five days to cool off at the pool of your new home
  Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - Fixed-term agreements under the Consumer Protection Act – interesting implications for landlords
  Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - The Consumer Protection Act – A New Liability
  Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - Competition regulations change under the Consumer Protection Act.
  Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - The Consumer Protection Act
  Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - No quick fix! The consumer’s right to claim a refund under the Consumer Protection Act
  Bowman Gilfillan - Much more to a name than meets the Consumer Protection Act´s eye
  Bowman Gilfillan - The Consumer Protection Act: The Duty To Register Names
  Bowman Gilfillan - Consumer Protection Act and leases
  Bowman Gilfillan - An opportunity for franchisors — The Consumer Protection Act
  Bowman Gilfillan - Key franchising aspects of the consumer protection act
  Impact of CPA (2)
  Impact of CPA (1)
  Adams & Adams - Are you ready for the Consumer Protection Act
  Adams & Adams - Minister’s attempt to delay application of CPA might be invalid
  An Introduction to and the General Application of the Consumer Protection Act
  Residential Lease Agreements and The Consumer Protection Act
  Voetstoots Clauses And The Consumer Protection Act
  I Know My Rights.Do You Know Yours?
  Fundamental Consumer Protection Rights under the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008
  Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008
  CPA imposes strict liability on suppliers
  Indirect implications of the CPA must be considered
  The exposure of suppliers for product liability claims

 
 
  © phatshoane henney inc. 2007

Contact Us  |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy